<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That&#039;s What Twitter Is To Me&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/01/11/thats-what-twitter-is-to-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/01/11/thats-what-twitter-is-to-me/</link>
	<description>Jared Stein&#039;s archived blog on education, technology, culture, and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:41:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared M. Stein</title>
		<link>http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/01/11/thats-what-twitter-is-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared M. Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/01/11/thats-what-twitter-is-to-me/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>What you say is true, but because we know that anything digital and on the web is in someway innately public/insecure (and, yes, I am aware of this all the time) what I appear to be doing is making a stand on principle rather than on absolute, impeccable practicality.  Or I&#039;m simply, as you say, lowering my voice.  I do the same thing in a coffee shop.  I know the people around me _could_ hear me if they wanted to, but I also understand that most of them won&#039;t care to.  The same could be said about public Tweets, sure, but my personality says let&#039;s declare myself to be semi-private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you say is true, but because we know that anything digital and on the web is in someway innately public/insecure (and, yes, I am aware of this all the time) what I appear to be doing is making a stand on principle rather than on absolute, impeccable practicality.  Or I&#8217;m simply, as you say, lowering my voice.  I do the same thing in a coffee shop.  I know the people around me _could_ hear me if they wanted to, but I also understand that most of them won&#8217;t care to.  The same could be said about public Tweets, sure, but my personality says let&#8217;s declare myself to be semi-private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/01/11/thats-what-twitter-is-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/01/11/thats-what-twitter-is-to-me/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I agree with all of your Twitter uses (and share them). We just have a fundamentally different perspective on what is important in making personal networks grow. You are happy with the growth you see and the contacts you make by limiting your network, I am happier leaving it open, making it more likely that people will come in from the outside. I also want my Twitters to feed into all the tools that are being built on it using the API. It&#039;s no different to me than flickr or del.icio.us-- I default to public. If a system doesn&#039;t give me a choice and I have to choose one mode for all, I will opt for public. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We both know there is no real privacy. You are choosing to lower your voice but you are still at a public table... security through obscurity is no security at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all of your Twitter uses (and share them). We just have a fundamentally different perspective on what is important in making personal networks grow. You are happy with the growth you see and the contacts you make by limiting your network, I am happier leaving it open, making it more likely that people will come in from the outside. I also want my Twitters to feed into all the tools that are being built on it using the API. It&#8217;s no different to me than flickr or del.icio.us&#8211; I default to public. If a system doesn&#8217;t give me a choice and I have to choose one mode for all, I will opt for public. </p>
<p>We both know there is no real privacy. You are choosing to lower your voice but you are still at a public table&#8230; security through obscurity is no security at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
