<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DT&amp;L08: The Cheatability Factor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/08/08/dtl08-the-cheatability-factor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/08/08/dtl08-the-cheatability-factor/</link>
	<description>Jared Stein&#039;s archived blog on education, technology, culture, and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:41:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared Stein</title>
		<link>http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/08/08/dtl08-the-cheatability-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexknowlogy.learningfield.org/2008/08/08/dtl08-the-cheatability-factor/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>I just got the reviews from the DT&amp;L presentation in Madison. Of 18 evaluations submitted we averaged 4.75 out of 5. Nice! Here are the comments:

“Bingo was a brilliant idea to engage listening! Very cool! Best information session of the conference”
“Excellent presentation!”
“Expand!”
“Disorganized, irrelevant. Time management.”

Wow, that last comment was a little harsh! We like to think of our presentation as “open” and “customizable” based on the audience’s interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got the reviews from the DT&amp;L presentation in Madison. Of 18 evaluations submitted we averaged 4.75 out of 5. Nice! Here are the comments:</p>
<p>“Bingo was a brilliant idea to engage listening! Very cool! Best information session of the conference”<br />
“Excellent presentation!”<br />
“Expand!”<br />
“Disorganized, irrelevant. Time management.”</p>
<p>Wow, that last comment was a little harsh! We like to think of our presentation as “open” and “customizable” based on the audience’s interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
